Skip to main content

India and Bharat: Exploring India's Dual Identity

India, that is Bharat: Exploring India's Dual Identity

In the heart of India's historical journey towards independence and nationhood, a crucial debate emerged within the Constituent Assembly in 1949: should the newly formed nation be officially named 'Bharat' or 'India'? This debate, which unfolded nearly a year after the initial draft of the Indian Constitution, remains relevant today as the nation grapples with its identity. In recent times, the renaming of the G-20 Summit invitations to "President of Bharat" has reignited discussions about the nation's nomenclature and its deep-rooted historical connotations.

Historical Perspectives on the Names "India" and "Bharat"

Constitutionality

  • Article 1 of the Indian Constitution already establishes the interchangeability of "India" and "Bharat" by stating, "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States." This provision acknowledges the historical significance of both names.
  • The preamble of the Indian Constitution begins with "We the People of India," but the Hindi version uses "Bharat" instead of India, indicating the interchangeable use of these names.
  • Moreover, some government institutions, such as the Indian Railways, have long used Hindi variants that include "Bharatiya," reinforcing the nation's dual nomenclature.

Origin of the Name Bharat

  • The term "Bharat" carries profound historical and cultural roots, tracing back to Puranic literature and the epic Mahabharata. Vishnu Purana describes "Bharata" as the land between the southern sea and the northern snowy Himalayan mountains, symbolizing a socio-cultural entity rather than just a political or geographical one.
  • Furthermore, Bharata is the name of a legendary ancient king, considered the forefather of the Rig Vedic tribes of Bharatas, symbolizing the progenitor of all the subcontinent's people.

Origin of the Name India

  • In contrast, the name "India" is derived from the word "Indus," which refers to the river flowing through the northwestern part of the subcontinent.
  • The ancient Greeks referred to the people living beyond the Indus as "Indoi," signifying "the people of Indus." This term was later adopted by Persians and Arabs as "Hind" or "Hindustan" to refer to the land of the Indus.
  • Ultimately, the Europeans embraced the name "India" from these sources, making it the official name of the country during British colonial rule.

Constitutional Assembly on India and Bharat

  • During the drafting of the Indian Constitution in 1949, the question of naming the nation led to heated debates within the Constituent Assembly. Members of the assembly held diverse opinions on this matter.
  • Some members argued that "India" reminded them of colonial oppression and advocated for prioritizing "Bharat" in official documents.
  • Seth Govind Das and others emphasized that "India" was a relatively recent term, while "Bharat" had deep historical and cultural roots, mentioned in ancient texts like the Vedas, Upanishads, and Mahabharata.
  • Kallur Subba Rao even proposed renaming the Hindi language as "Bharati" to align it with the spirit of "Bharat."

Recent Development

  • Despite the historical debate, in 2015, the central government opposed a name change, citing extensive deliberations during the Constitution's drafting.
  • The Supreme Court of India has twice rejected pleas to rename 'India' to 'Bharat,' confirming that both names are recognized in the Constitution.

Conclusion

The debate surrounding the official name of India, whether 'India' or 'Bharat,' has deep historical, cultural, and constitutional roots. While "India" has colonial origins, "Bharat" represents the nation's ancient heritage and rich cultural legacy. The continued use of both names in the Constitution reflects the nation's acknowledgment of its diverse historical perspectives. As India navigates its path in the 21st century, the dual nomenclature serves as a reminder of the country's complex and multifaceted identity, embracing its historical heritage while progressing towards a future that incorporates the best of both worlds.

 

Reference

1. 23 Different Names of India - LifeStalker

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Curious Case of Bal Sant Abhinav Arora: Rise of Child Preachers in India

Child Preacher (Image Generated using AI) A child steps forward to recite scripture, their voice brimming with sincerity. It’s a captivating sight, whether in a bustling temple in India, a solemn church in the United States, or broadcasted across millions of homes in Australia. The innocence of a child preacher has a universal effect: it stirs wonder, admiration, and awe. People are drawn to the purity of their words, which seem untouched by the complexities of adulthood, as though these children have a more direct line to the divine. But beyond this fascination lies a more complex reality that raises important questions about faith, innocence, and the adults who may be guiding these young figures. In India, one prominent example is Abhinav Arora, a nine-year-old spiritual orator from Delhi, who has captured millions of followers on social media. Known as "Bal Sant" (child saint), Abhinav appears to embody true devotion, performing rituals and delivering spiritual messages wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hindi Heartland and its Hindi Problem: Can Regional Languages Help North India Grow?

Indian States and UTs SDG Ranking by NITI Aayog Recently, NITI Aayog has released its 3rd annual report on Sustainable Development Goals in collaboration with the United Nations. In this report, they have evaluated and ranked all 36 states and union territories on the basis of the progress they have made on 17 Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 set by the United Nations. Currently, the score for Team India stands at 66 out of 100, which is 6 points improvement from the last evaluation. But when we look at the regional level, we discover some interesting points. First, that most of the states which are above national average with exception of Himachal Pradesh and Haryana are non-Hindi speaking states. Second, most of the states which are performing below the national average are Hindi speaking states. So what’s cooking up here? The answer lies in the languages. Or more specifically the answer lies in Hindi. First of all, we need to understand that languages are products of a continu...
Post a Comment
Read more

FOSS: Should India Make the Big Software Switch?

FOSS: Should India Make the Big Software Switch?/Image Credit: JMEXCLUSIVES Can a country save billions of dollars by making a "software switch"? If you think the answer is "no," then for your kind information, a country has already done it. In May 2019, South Korea announced its plan to switch from Microsoft Windows to a Linux distro on its 3.3 million computing devices. According to the South Korean officials, it will save them up to 780 billion won (51 billion Indian rupees), otherwise which would spend on buying Microsoft Windows licenses. In India, similar steps were taken by the Government of Kerala when they switched to a homegrown Linux-based operating system KITE GNU Linux in their schools and saved around 3 billion Indian rupees . So now the question arises, Should your country make the switch? or in our case, Should India make the switch? And the answer is Yes. But this should not be implemented without understanding the challenges. Challenges 1. Learning...
Post a Comment
Read more